@InProceedings{RosanGGOPMAHVWTBFS:2021:AsLaUs,
author = "Rosan, Thais M. and Goldewijk, Kess Klein and Ganzenm{\"u}ller,
Raphael and O'Sullivan, Michael and Pongratz, Julia and Mercado,
Lina M. and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de and
Heinrich, Viola and Von Randow, Celso and Wiltshire, Andrew and
Tubiello, Francesco N. and Bastos, Ana and Friedlingstein, Pierre
and Stich, Stephen",
affiliation = "{University of Exeter} and {Utrecht University} and
{Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit{"a}t} and {University of Exeter}
and {Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit{"a}t} and {University of
Exeter} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{University of Bristol} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Met Office Hadley Centre} and FAO and {Max
Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry} and {University of Exeter}
and {University of Exeter}",
title = "Assessment of land use and land cover datasets for Brazil and
impact on C emissions",
year = "2021",
organization = "EGU General Assembly",
publisher = "EGU",
abstract = "Brazil is responsible for about one third of the global land use
and land cover change (LULCC) carbon dioxide emissions. However,
there is a disagreement among different methodologies on the
magnitude and trends in emissions and their geographic
distribution. One of the main uncertainties is associated with
different LULCC datatasets used as input in the different
approaches. In this work we perform an evaluation of LULCC
datasets for Brazil, including the global dataset (HYDE 3.2) used
in the annual Global Carbon Budget (GCB), and national Brazilian
dataset (MapBiomas) over the period 2000-2018. We also analyze the
latest global HYDE 3.3 dataset based on new FAO inventory
estimates and multi-annual ESA CCI satellite-based land cover
maps. Results show that the new HYDE 3.3 can represent well the
observed spatial variation in cropland and pastures areas over the
last decades compared to national data (MapBiomas) and shows an
improvement compared to HYDE 3.2 used in GCB. However, the
magnitude of LULCC assessed with HYDE 3.3 is lower than national
estimates from MapBiomas. Finally, we used HYDE 3.3 as input to
two different approaches included in GCB, a global bookkeeping
model (BLUE) and a process-based Dynamic Global Vegetation Model
(JULES-ES) to determine the impact of the new version of HYDE
dataset on Brazils land-use emissions trends over the period
2000-2017. Both JULES-ES and BLUE now simulate a negative land-use
emissions trend for the last two decades. This negative trend is
in agreement with Brazilian INPE-EM, global H\&N bookkeeping
models, FAO and as reported in National GHG inventories (NGHGI),
although magnitudes differ among approaches. Overall, the
inclusion of the multi-annual ESA CCI Land Cover dataset to
allocate spatially the FAO statistical data has improved spatial
representation of agricultural area change in Brazil in the last
two decades, contributing to improve global model capability to
simulate Brazils LULCC emissions in agreement with national trends
estimates and spatial distribution.",
conference-location = "Online",
conference-year = "19-30 apr.",
doi = "10.5194/egusphere-egu21-3065",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-3065",
language = "en",
targetfile = "EGU21-3065-print.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "09 maio 2024"
}